How Does X-Ray Detection Work?
Fundamentally, X-ray systems for product inspection operate similarly to other X-ray systems you may be familiar with, such as those at hospitals or at airport security. A beam of X-rays is produced using an X-ray generator and is projected towards the object being inspected. Think of this beam as a bright light. The density and composition of the object determines how much of the X-ray is absorbed. In our analogy, as the bright light passes through the package being inspected, shadows are cast based on different densities. Whatever “shadows” (X-rays) that pass through are then captured by a detector array, which gives a 2D representation of the object. The software then reads this image and looks for defects – the denser the contaminant, the more contrast appears and the easier it is to detect.
Now that we’ve established that contaminant density is one of the biggest factors in successful detection, let’s compare the densities of various materials. Water has a density of 1000 kg/m3, gravel has a density of 1250 kg/m3, glass has a density of 2579 kg/m3, and stainless steel has a density of 7600 kg/m3. Plastics have a range of densities with – most of them being close to the density of water. Polyethylene (PET) has a density of 750 kg/m3, low-density polyethylene (LDPE) has a density of 920 kg/m3, high-density polyethyelene (HDPE) has a density of 950 kg/m3, polycarbonate (PC) has a density of 1200 kg/m3, and acetal has a density of 1410 kg/m3. There are a few plastics higher density plastics, such as PTFE (Teflon) at 2200 kg/m3 and Viton at 1800 kg/m3. As you may have surmised with food inspection with X-Ray systems, the closer the contaminant’s density is to water, the harder it will be to detect.
Increase Your Odds of Detection
If the plastic contaminants you are attempting to find are too close in density to your product and you are unable to reliably detect them using an X-ray inspection system, analyse your process to determine if there are any opportunities to substitute for high density plastics, such as PTFE or Viton. If possible, avoid plastics similar in density to water such as HDPE, UHMW, and LDPE. Additionally a new group of X-ray detectable plastics such as Sustarin C®, which is a replacement for acetal, or Polystone®, which is a replacement for UHMW. Another approach to improve the detectability of plastic contaminents is to utilize an X-ray system with triple beam architecture. These systems split the X-ray source into three beams, which allows for three different perspectives of a contaminant, thereby eliminating any blind spots and increasing the chance of detection.
Whether you are using a single beam or triple beam X-ray inspection system, best practice techniques will ensure the best chance of detecting contaminants. Inspect the product across the minimum thickness the less material the X-ray is passing through, the more contrast you’ll see from a contaminant. A further technique is to present the product with as much consistency as possible. For example, inspecting a bulk product like nuts or dried fruit, consider integrating a vibratory table to more evenly distribute the contents, thereby increasing the contrast from a contaminant and increasing the odds of detection.
For more helpful resources from Peco InspX visit https://www.peco-inspx.com/lp/resources